# Your step-by-step guide to the perfect sandwich

29 May 2012 by Pete Etchells, posted in Uncategorized

I’m an avid eater of sandwiches – some might say I’m a connoisseur. If you blindfold me and give me a tuna mayo on white and a ham on brown, and I’ll tell you the difference straight away. If only You Bet was still on television.

So, you’ll believe me when I say that I was absolutely ecstatic, chuffed, relieved, verb, when I found out that scientists – sorry, ‘boffins’ – have found the formula for making a perfect sandwich:

"It just looks like a mathematics nightmare to us, but we are assured this set of squiggles is the holy grail to making the perfect sandwich.

In principle, this formula will also describe the butter seeping into the bread, particularly as it warms up because D can depend upon temperature.

{(∂v(x,t))/∂t+ v(x,t)∇.v(x,t)}= ∇p(x,t)+ μ∇^2 v(x,t)+ g

At the interfaces we have a physical and chemical reaction of absorption. The reaction rates depends upon the concentration in the air and the activation energy, Ea, and the area exposed to the air."

How cool is that? Now, that equation looks a little complicated, so in the interests of science, I felt compelled to test it out. That, and I really wanted to know what the perfect sandwich is.

STEP 1:

{(∂v(x,t))/∂t+ v(x,t)∇.v(x,t)}= ∇p(x,t)+ μ∇^2 v(x,t)+ g

Hmm. Er, okay, I think I need to start with bread – I guess one of those terms must mean ‘get bread’. Maybe the ‘g’. I don’t know.

STEP 2:

Okay, I’m lost. Thankfully, the press release has an outline of the process in a much easier-to-understand way.

“Pressure: Don’t apply unnecessary pressure (the p(x,t) term) it squeezes out the water.”

Got it. No pressure.

No exams for you this summer, Mr Sammich! But the coursework deadlines still apply. Firm but fair, I think.

STEP 3:

Back to the boffins on this one:
“Freshness: The equations describe the deterioration with time due to slow diffusion of the moisture, so eat your sandwich while it is fresh.”

But I’ve not made it yet! Okay, I guess I’ll leave this until the end. Note to self: eat sandwich as soon as it is made.

STEP 4:

“Butter: Use a thick layer of butter, it is hydrophobic and keeps moisture away from the bread.”

Now we’re getting somewhere.

Thick layer of butter, tick. Next!

STEP 5:
"Moisture: Control the loss, or uptake, of moisture from the air into the bread:

1. Butter protects the top."

More butter? Well, okay…

“2. Crusts are good; they stop the edges drying out (φair < φbread) or going soggy (φbread < φair).”

Well, I do like crusts. This seems to be getting silly now though…

“3. Wrap the sandwich tightly to keep air away from the underneath – but don’t squeeze it of course.”

Okay, I tried my best on this one, but if you’ve ever got a present from me, you know what I’m like with wrapping things, so I apologise if it’s not very good. Anyway, wrapped tightly, check. I didn’t know what the equation meant, so I went with wrapping paper, is that right?

STEP 6:

“Temperature: Most equations are temperature dependent particularly viscosity and absorption rates, keep it cool to reduce the reaction rates.”

Keep it cool, got it.

STEP 7:

“Bread: Use the right bread, a thicker slice has a greater resistance to dampness and can’t dry out so quickly either.”

Why wasn’t this step 1?! I’ve used completely the wrong bread! So close, yet so far. Oh well, it may not be the perfect sandwich, but I guess it’s pretty close:

So there you have it, the formula for a perfect sandwich, in 7 easy steps. I must admit, my hopes are slightly dashed – I had hoped for some sort of filling, like tuna mayo with popping candy, or unicorn spam, or something. But I’m not an expert in these matters, so what do I know?

No, I’ve not actually lost my mind. I intended to write a thoughtful post about how this type of churnalism makes us all look bad – scientists and journalists alike. I just didn’t know where to start. For a less silly commentary on the ridiculousness of “Scientists find a perfect formula for X”-type articles, see my old blog here, or Ben Goldacre’s column about Blue Monday here. In the meantime, scientists, next time someone asks you to be a boffin for a seasonal formula, try and maintain some self-respect and say no, ok?

## 22 Responses to “Your step-by-step guide to the perfect sandwich”

ew~~it looks disgusting ~ but the taste maybe will be nice~

Still don’t think it would be the worst sarnie I’ve ever tasted. Good job actually testing the theory as well!

No wonder it’s a crap sandwich – you screwed up in Stage 6. Give it some shades, man!

Perhaps not as the filling, though.

Your Twitter is your audience, so try not to confuse them. "If you're answering someone's questions or comments, don't just tweet out their name and the message "yes" or "I think so." It's meaningless to your followers. Always re-quote or re-tweet their message along with your answer," suggests communications consultant Mark Jeffries. If you want to have a private conversation, do it with a direct message.

The name of the person Holmes allegedly threatened has been blacked out. In court testimony Aug. 30, University of Colorado psychiatrist Lynne Fenton, also a professor at the school, said she contacted campus police after meeting with Holmes on June 11.

Snowden, a 29-year-old former CIA employee who currently works as a contractor for the National Security Agency as an employee of contracting giant Booz Allen Hamilton, claimed responsibility for the leaks that have roiled Washington for the last week, saying: "I have no intention of hiding who I am because I have done nothing wrong."

The online spying is directed at companies with ties to military technology. But energy, finance and other industries have also been hacked over the past five years.

"From my perspective, if the joke is funny, I laugh," Christie said. "Even if it's about me. If it's not funny, I don't laugh. But I've never felt like it was, you know, anything that really bugged me all that much."

Seale: Our members own more numbers of rare and endangered species than any other association in the world. Three of our biggest successes have been the scimitar horned oryx, the addax and the dama gazelle. Our numbers have absolutely just skyrocketed in the last, last 15-20 years.

In total, the new coming 2013-15 budget will raise \$32.66 billion -- up about \$2 billion from the current budget.

Giving is evolving with digital technology, Bridget Carey, senior editor of CNET.com, said on "The Early Show."

As cloud computing grows, questions of energy source will surely be part of the evolving conversation. While Greenpeace's report suggests some of these companies are using so-called "dirty" energy, overall cloud computing can be relatively energy efficient.