SciLogs International .com.eu.be.es.de
scilogs-logo
spektrum-logo
nature-logo
CounterbalancedMaking sense of scientific news
  • Home
  • Blogs

Welcome to Counterbalanced

12 March 2012 by Pete Etchells, posted in Uncategorized

Hello, world! My name’s Pete Etchells, and I’m a post-doctoral Psychologist at the University of Bristol, UK. In this blog, I’ll be writing about bits and pieces of science (with an emphasis on Psychology) that crop up in the news, so we can take a look at the actual research behind the story. I want to see how that research translates into the final article, and what might have changed in the process, and why. Along the way, I hope I can arm you all with some tools to be able to dissect news stories yourselves, look at the evidence about what’s being reported, and decide on your own whether the conclusions make any sense.

And what an exciting time to start a blog like this! Tomorrow, the Royal Institution is hosting a debate involving journalists and scientists, looking at how we might improve the relationship between research and reporting. Last week, the Guardian science blogs posted opening statements from both the journalist’s and scientist’s points of view, and I’ll be posting a report here in the following days about what actually happened at the event. If you’ve not already bought tickets and are in London tomorrow night, then what are you waiting for? You can grab some here.

Life as a scientist, particularly as an early-career scientist, is pretty tough nowadays. Funding and jobs are scarce, and the pressure to publish is huge. One thing that I’ll also be writing about here from time-to-time is about my experiences trying to start a career in research. To that end, I would love to hear from students (both under- and postgraduate) about what sorts of resources would help them get along, or what sorts of experiences they’re currently having trying to get that first foot in the lab door. I’d also love to hear from the other end of the scale; for instance, what are Profs and lead investigators looking for in their students and researchers? Hopefully, we can start building up a resource (or links to existing resources) that can help everyone; after all, we’re all in this together.

Finally, I can’t help but mention that if you happen to be in Bristol, UK, this week, the absolutely magnificent @-Bristol science centre is hosting Brilliant Brain Week from March 13 -18. If you want to come down and learn about your brain from neuroscientists at the cutting edge of research, I’d wholeheartedly recommend it! (plus I’ll be on-hand all day on Saturday, I’d love to say hi!).

I’m really excited about Counterbalanced, and I hope everyone will find this blog interesting, insightful and helpful. Please feel free to send me your thoughts and ideas, and you can always find me on twitter: @drpeteetchells

Tags: media, public engagement, science

5 Responses to “Welcome to Counterbalanced”

  1. Laura Wheeler 12 March 2012 3:27pm Reply | Permalink

    Welcome! I am excited about Counterbalanced too and looking forward to your first post! :)

  2. Pete Etchells 12 March 2012 3:33pm Reply | Permalink

    Thanks Laura! I’m hoping I can get everyone as excited about reading it as I will be about writing it! :)

  3. Lou Woodley 12 March 2012 3:56pm Reply | Permalink

    Welcome, Peter! If you’re going to be at the RI event in person tomorrow night, do say hi :)

  4. Suzi Gage 12 March 2012 4:01pm Reply | Permalink

    This looks great! I wish I was around for the RI event tomorrow, but may be able to pop by @Bristol on Saturday :)

  5. Laura Wheeler 13 March 2012 12:17pm Reply | Permalink

    Peter we will also be attending the RI event today! See you there

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

 
Avatar of Pete Etchells
  • Pete Etchells
  • About the blog
  • Blog homepage

Recent Posts

  • It’s not a failure when you fail to replicate
  • Guest post: Autistic traits in children with ADHD: a marker of severity?
  • Creation: Q&A with Adam Rutherford
  • How useful is ‘screen time’?
  • Serendipity and diligence: the story of early drug discoveries

Recent comments

  • It’s not a failure when you fail to replicateAp Dijksterhuis: "Just for the record: 1. The Nature article is strangely biased, and Nature is now investigating matters. 2. The intelligence…"
  • It’s not a failure when you fail to replicateStephan Schleim: "I agree with the general notion that a failure to replicate a result does not mean that the original result…"
  • It’s not a failure when you fail to replicateGerard te Meerman: "There is a statistical aspect of replication relating to the power to replicate a result. It is not likely that…"
  • It’s not a failure when you fail to replicateKeith Laws: "Nice post Pete and I absolutely agree about the fact that 'failure' to replicate (and I have said before, we…"
  • It’s not a failure when you fail to replicatePatricia J Hawkins: "I agree that the headlines were bad. However, as I understand it, the original researchers apparently refused to supply their…"

Archives

  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012

Categories

Tags

#riscimedia academic misconduct Adam Rutherford BeBraiNY Cade CO2 conduct disorder COPE correlation creationism debunking disulfiram dopamine drugs evolution eye fraud funding giant's causeway grants impact media misconduct obesity PLOS postdoc psychology public engagement quality quantity REF Ri science science journalism scientific method screen time solo12fraud SoNYC spidergoat spiderpig SpotOn student synthetic biology television video games

@DrPeteEtchells on Twitter

  1. Pete Etchells
    Pete Etchells: RT @ZachWeiner: Isn't it amazing that evolution can produce so much diversity in just 6,000 years?
    about 19 minutes ago

  2. Pete Etchells
    Pete Etchells: @dgmacarthur @edyong209 I love the way you handle a Bunsen burner....
    about 32 minutes ago

  3. Pete Etchells
    Pete Etchells: @dgmacarthur @edyong209 wait, was it a euphemism?
    about 37 minutes ago

  4. Pete Etchells
    Pete Etchells: Scientists, I cannot recommend Ed's post highly enough. Read and digest.
    about 42 minutes ago

  5. Pete Etchells
    Pete Etchells: RT @edyong209: I want to clarify that I’ve never actually opened an interview with “Science me up, nerd”. Except possibly to @dgmacarthur t…
    about 43 minutes ago

RSS Posts all over SciLogs.com

  • It’s great to be a woman scientist; it’s challenging to be a woman scientist
  • Picking a National Champion for Science
  • The Delights of Data
  • Raw and Uncut 1: Tameness of Birds and Fear of Man, An Acquired Instinct
  • Eyes on Columbia Glacier’s retreat
  • Science in the Magic House

© 2013 Counterbalanced